PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2991-A1 |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840x2160x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120402 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '23 at 21:08 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 187 211 219 225 228 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
21GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 92 91 93 91 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 25x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 19x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 49x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 8x |
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $35 |