Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory44.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 653
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 1863 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 130
Parallax 116
93% 120 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 113
Splatting 101
87% 107 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1811 2030 2064 2169 2180 2169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 2,090
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 2,070
438% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 56.5
184% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 416
305% 401 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 287%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
3GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 452
Mixed 392
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 48.8
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 356
265% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 KHX2400C15D4/8G Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 48GB
2473, 2473, 2473, 2473 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback