Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 342%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 376%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics298% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive466% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230119
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 210
2-Core 427
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 847
8-Core 1,428
138% 1,137 Pts
64-Core 2,454
152% 2,454 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Lighting 451
Reflection 423
Parallax 454
368% 443 fps
MRender 551
Gravity 365
Splatting 262
306% 393 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 298%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2455 3389 3702 3722 1867 1368 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
466% Outstanding
Read 3,088
Write 3,046
Mixed 2,211
SusWrite 2,751
624% 2,774 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 84.2
333% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,087
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,430
1,123% 1,575 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 466%
Great: 570%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
310GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 486 479 446 349 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 482
Mixed 419
SusWrite 442
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.5
194% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 147
117% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-40B190X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 45.5
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 31
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback