bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System GT70 2OC/2OD
Motherboard MS-1763
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 09:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 485
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 110B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 6.9
3% 22.9 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$226
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 398 105 86 66 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 437
Write 406
Mixed 15
SusWrite 142
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 9.5
56% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 192
129% 163 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
192GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 96 93 92 91 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 80
Write 96.1
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 89.4
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-073.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback