Colorful X15 AT 23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemColorful X15 AT 23  (all builds)
MotherboardCOLORFUL X15 AT 23
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 09:24
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U29, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 190
2-Core 369
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,196
118% 967 Pts
64-Core 1901
118% 1901 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 185
Parallax 115
116% 147 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 118
Splatting 95.2
110% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1769 1467 1601 1736 1731 1943 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,381
Write 1,503
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 1,708
341% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 44.6
161% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,473
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,300
975% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 267%
Great: 347%
WD PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G 512GB
275GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 1331 1342 1331 699 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,096
Write 1137
Mixed 978
SusWrite 1,015
238% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 56.4
198% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 670
575% 833 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 207%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X15 AT 23 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Colorful X15 AT 23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback