Illegear ARTE 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIllegear ARTE 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 06:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 224
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 606
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1D05 114C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 59.2
50% 61.4 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 53.8
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 1316 1316 1433 1473 1485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 1,401
376% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 77.8
265% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 947
727% 997 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 297%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 16G3200CL22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 30.5
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 18.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ARTE 14 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Illegear ARTE 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback