Acer Aspire V3-371

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-371  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V3-371
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150903
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 06:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 111
54% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 174
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 0919) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 6.2
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HJF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 79 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 77.6
Write 86.4
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 80.9
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1302 PSD38G1600L2S 12GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-371 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback