Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 35.6 1-Core 43.9 2-Core 71.3 30% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 107 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.2 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SMI DISK 240GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFME1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 97 73 66 109 54 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 106 Write 53.1 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 89.5 18% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 7 35% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 22.4 18% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	3x

SSD
SSDPR-S400U-240-80 240GBBench 71%, 100 samples	2x
DISK 240GBSMIBench 71%, 129 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	2x
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16