Ibuypower INTEL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemIbuypower INTEL  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B660 DS3H AC DDR4-Y1
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 01:24
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 318
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 943
93% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,197
74% 1,197 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 172
Parallax 169
156% 178 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
117% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,782
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,490
380% 1703 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 70
266% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,458
DQ Write 1,282
DQ Mixed 1,072
885% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
XPG SPECTRIX S20G 500GB
379GB free
Firmware: VC0S0285
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1515 1519 1425 1499 1493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,872
Write 1,413
Mixed 1,033
SusWrite 1,490
325% 1,452 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 58.4
216% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 934
719% 974 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 276%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Adata DDR4 3000 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 24GB
3200, 2933, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 34.4
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 28.2
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INTEL Builds (Compare 7,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

System: Ibuypower INTEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback