Lenovo 30B5001KUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30B5001KUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory36.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 533
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 392.68
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 91
Parallax 83
65% 84.6 fps
MRender 87.1
Gravity 84.8
Splatting 95
74% 89 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1301 1316 1354 1341 1344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,287
Write 1,298
Mixed 817
SusWrite 1293
316% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 50.7
165% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 440
354% 511 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 246%
Great: 363%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 434 439 447 444 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 434
Mixed 424
SusWrite 431
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 41.4
136% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 156
169% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$1,499
447GB free
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 1421 1498 1516 1516 1511 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1941
Write 1518
Mixed 1682
SusWrite 1,368
365% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 104
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 86.6
308% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 445
360% 521 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 281%
Great: 541%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189
7.5TB free
Firmware: 1H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 219 220 218 222 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 210
Mixed 112
SusWrite 220
140% 191 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.1
317% 3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G3B1 HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B5001KUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 30B5001KUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback