MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B33
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 18:59
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 408
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 28
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 198 199 164 156 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 450
Write 426
Mixed 372
SusWrite 176
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 301
230% 311 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 134%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 199 199 231 240 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 427
Write 432
Mixed 354
SusWrite 216
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 28.3
118% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 230
196% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 117%
Spcc Solid State Disk 3TB
87GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 59
Mixed 62
SusWrite 109
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
10GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 89 90 87 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 74.2
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 87.4
49% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33) Builds (Compare 1,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback