Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 174
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 506
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 120
Parallax 137
110% 131 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
112% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 174 177 180 191 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 433
Write 402
Mixed 392
SusWrite 183
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 36.3
116% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 312
231% 307 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 133%
WDC WDS2 00T2B0B 2TB
62GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 225 224 228 315 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 382
Write 133
Mixed 164
SusWrite 261
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 26.1
89% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 182
138% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
289GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 175 177 180 191 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 428
Write 403
Mixed 327
SusWrite 183
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 36.8
120% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 318
238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 134%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 172 173 171 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 171
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.8
362% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 138%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
7TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 175 177 180 194 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 212
Mixed 152
SusWrite 184
146% 198 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 2.8
653% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 138%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
350GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 102 112 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 214
Mixed 103
SusWrite 104
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1.8
389% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94%
Great: 138%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 111 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 168
Write 163
Mixed 79
SusWrite 106
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
35GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 21 12 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 98%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
7TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 104 114 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 210
Mixed 118
SusWrite 108
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 3
541% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 138%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
350GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 110 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 105
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.7
343% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64%
Great: 138%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 104 112 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 107
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback