Acer Swift SF314-512

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-512  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Shark_ADP
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 65
1-Core 189
2-Core 329
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 995
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,446
90% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1612) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 28.2
20% 26.9 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 21.9
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
537GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1620 1459 1771 1768 1709 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,280
Write 1,639
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 1,587
324% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 61.6
214% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 588
420% 544 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 237%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 53.2
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 138%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-512 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-512

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback