TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 498
61% 469 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 108
Parallax 121
97% 116 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 113
Splatting 100
102% 129 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 98.6%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 160GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 4.9 5.9 5.7 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 82
Write 67
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 9.3
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 7
1,197% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 27.4%
 Great: 27%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 13 20 18 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 61.6
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 17.5
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 5.4
902% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 24.9%
 Great: 38%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
231GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 20 21 19 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 77.4
Write 66.5
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 21.3
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 6
1,023% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 29.3%
 Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8313 CL17-17-17 D4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 64.8%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel  $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples232x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples205x
Core i3-8100Intel  $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples39x
GPU
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples48x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples46x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples56x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples26x
RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples23x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback