Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory245 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 200
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 676
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 2,032
126% 2,032 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Dell(1028 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 113
Parallax 110
157% 139 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 113
Splatting 99.6
84% 102 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 126%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1262 1243 1242 1240 1240 1251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1,150
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 1,246
301% 1,350 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 45.1
149% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 581
410% 527 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 222%
Great: 393%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 1773 1721 1765 1726 1761 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM1-CRC 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback