PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151019 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 31 '23 at 10:47 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 73 20 41 55 35 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
21.3%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 53x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 37x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 90x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 20x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 8x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $139 |