Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 03:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 184
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 336
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 77.3
46% 64.1 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 43.6
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm20ar128sdkm2 128GB 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 55 36 58 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 436
Write 103
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 52.8
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 12
71% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 12.7
39% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
65GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 34.1
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 33.9
48% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 34.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 18.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback