Essentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEssentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709  (all builds)
Motherboardessentielb H81H3-EM2
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 22:19
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 171
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 284
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 878A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 87.9
72% 88 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 72.8
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 301 298 308 308 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 445
Write 429
Mixed 348
SusWrite 298
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 38
120% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 329
244% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
463GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 347 355 390 397 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 405
Mixed 403
SusWrite 359
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 41.7
134% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 336
251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
94GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 220 219 237 237 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.9% Good
Read 235
Write 222
Mixed 228
SusWrite 221
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 37.5
122% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 194
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 137%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
629GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 198 195 201 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 161
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 194
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
357% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Essentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback