PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Essentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709 (all builds) |
Motherboard | essentielb H81H3-EM2 |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150717 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 30 '23 at 22:19 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 878A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 301 298 308 308 308 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
463GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 347 355 390 397 396 MB/s
|
96.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
94GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 220 219 237 237 238 MB/s
|
69.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
629GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 198 195 201 200 201 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 12x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $387 |