Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 157 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 381 46% 353 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900615 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 210 94 100 99 96 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.1% Average	Read 211 Write 157 Mixed 159 SusWrite 151 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 18.2 77% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 31.3 DQ Mixed 24.8 19% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 405GB free Firmware: SD81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 98 99 100 102 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 73.4 Write 71.3 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 99.5 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030MN68F9F1600 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	18x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	9x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $522