bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 18:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 89.3
28% 51 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 415
38% 318 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 750GB
417GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 17 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 16.1
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 16.1
27% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback