Lenovo 30A6S01B0M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A6S01B0M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 162
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 618
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 106
90% 103 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 104
Splatting 84.3
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 243 248 247 244 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 1,024
Mixed 916
SusWrite 275
192% 858 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 26.9
88% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 198
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 205%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: A7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 323 303 291 317 289 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A6S01B0M Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 30A6S01B0M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback