Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 256%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 298%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive582% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$349
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 221
2-Core 435
130% 249 Pts
4-Core 864
8-Core 1,691
151% 1,277 Pts
64-Core 2,900
180% 2,900 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Zotac(19DA 3612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 5050 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Lighting 305
Reflection 378
Parallax 313
249% 332 fps
MRender 339
Gravity 253
Splatting 187
204% 260 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 207%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3802 3739 3783 3740 3733 3717 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
582% Outstanding
Read 4,186
Write 3,989
Mixed 2,901
SusWrite 3,752
834% 3707 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 85.1
316% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 2,238
DQ Write 1,778
DQ Mixed 1,922
1,462% 1,979 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 582%
Great: 633%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4937 MHz clocked @ 5966 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
320% Outstanding
MC Read 231
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 84.3
366% 128 GB/s
SC Read 48.4
SC Write 65.3
SC Mixed 60
165% 57.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 320%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback