HP 500-400nc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-400nc  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory11.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 42.9
23% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 85.5
8-Core 111
13% 98.2 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 145E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 39.7
42% 48.4 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 43.4
39% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 100 85 124 116 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.3% Poor
Read 133
Write 90.5
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 106
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 7
25% 8.37 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 15.5
13% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
399GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 125 104 137 128 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 171
Write 184
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 122
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-539.A00LF 99U5403-539.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-400nc Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-400nc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback