| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus CG5275 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG5275 |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 29 '17 at 07:19 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.3%
Above average
|
60% 104 Pts
|
28% 211 Pts
|
13% 213 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
16% 17 fps
|
15% 19.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
48% 65.8 MB/s
|
78% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
32.1%
Below average
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CG5275 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus CG5275
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 55x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 4x |
| Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |