Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 133
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 555
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.8
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fc700 256GB 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 395 399 411 381 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 426
Write 392
Mixed 362
SusWrite 397
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 19.1
85% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 49.3
82% 154 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback