Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D1  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 12:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 130
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 157
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 4.3
2% 4.27 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hi-level Ultra Series 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0715A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 79 80 49 40 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 339
Write 263
Mixed 295
SusWrite 87.8
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 12.3
60% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.5
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 26.9
58% 114 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 102%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
697GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 119
Write 19.7
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 24.5
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-A-1D1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback