Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 09:59
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 275
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 934
88% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,350
84% 1,350 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 175
Reflection 167
Parallax 158
143% 167 fps
Gravity 128
Splatting 111
105% 120 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,331
Write 2,146
Mixed 1,478
441% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 79.7
263% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 864
656% 883 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
74GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 472 470 472 459 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 477
Mixed 399
SusWrite 438
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 53.2
180% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 110
Write 123
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 137
157% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.4
260% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 100%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
195GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 57 56 56 58 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 85.1
Write 96.4
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 50.1
96% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
158GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 57 57 59 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 49.6
Write 53.9
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 56.8
68% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
91GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 1.4 1.4 0.5 1 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 71.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 7.4
69% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 34.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 34
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback