bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55HC
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 04:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3480
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 159
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 390
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 2.4
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 219 219 216 220 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.6% Above average
Read 238
Write 216
Mixed 223
SusWrite 220
51% 224 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 28.8
92% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 175
132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
449GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 114 109 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 127
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
378GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 23 55 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 8.7
Write 32
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 32.2
13% 18.7 MB/s
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
WDC WD10SPZX-21Z 1TB
882GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback