MSI PRO B660M-A WIFI (MS-7D43)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 230%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics320% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D43
MotherboardMSI PRO B660M-A WIFI (MS-7D43)  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 03:37
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$464
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 153
75% 121 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 587
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,544
96% 1,544 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
320% Outstanding
Lighting 454
Reflection 598
Parallax 794
370% 615 fps
MRender 557
Gravity 598
Splatting 315
383% 490 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 320%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2412 2636 2657 2701 2694 2682 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 2,592
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 2,630
508% 2,247 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 54.6
292% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 728
628% 930 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 376%
Great: 394%
Seagate ST6000NM0024 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: NS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 211 211 212 211 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 201
Mixed 103
SusWrite 211
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
270% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5U480016G-B 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 78.5
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 72.4
216% 75.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 36.6
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 192%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO B660M-A WIFI (MS-7D43) Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B660M-A WIFI (MS-7D43)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $951
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback