Acer Gateway NE46Rs1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Gateway NE46Rs1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Gateway NE46Rs1
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '17 at 03:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium A1018
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 86.1
44% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 113
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1D05 1003) 776MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3345
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500LPVX-00V0TT0 250GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 82.9
Write 82.6
Mixed 82.2
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.16
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gateway NE46Rs1 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Gateway NE46Rs1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback