Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 20:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 183
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 299
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 17
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 15.3
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 382 377 430 446 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 412
Mixed 385
SusWrite 402
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 38.4
129% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 275
229% 331 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback