Lenovo 90RC000SMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90RC000SMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 37.6
20% 30 Pts
4-Core 72.8
8-Core 119
12% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Asus(1043 88AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 69
Reflection 100
Parallax 168
56% 113 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
125% 159 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 455 347 307 285 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 760
Write 430
Mixed 463
SusWrite 358
112% 503 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 11.9
42% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 108
82% 112 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 347%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
159GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 178 173 174 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 91
Write 132
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 174
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN KF3200C16D4/8GX Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 32GB
2400, 3200, 2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 16.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RC000SMW Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 90RC000SMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback