Lenovo 10M8S14C3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10M8S14C3G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 191
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 264
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.5
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Power X SS1000-256GB 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 303 65 34 24 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 421
Write 357
Mixed 338
SusWrite 134
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 9.9
76% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 17.9
70% 151 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB4GU2666.C8HT 0443 RMUA5110KE68H9F-2400 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M8S14C3G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M8S14C3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback