Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 16:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 560
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 214
Parallax 248
184% 229 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 229
Splatting 168
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 165%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 309
Mixed 253
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 21.4
97% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 119
106% 159 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
95GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 50 51 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 41.2
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 50.5
39% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST1500DL001-9VT15L 1.5TB
273GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 98 98 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 50.3
Write 48.7
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 98.4
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
698GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 145 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 135
Write 113
Mixed 74
SusWrite 145
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 114%
External USB3.0 240GB
38GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 207 151 71 176 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 331
Write 295
Mixed 254
SusWrite 157
339% 259 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.5
1,584% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 21.7
1,713% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 164%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback