TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100608
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 12:26
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 33.5
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 64.3
27% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 92.7
8-Core 135
14% 114 Pts
64-Core 96.8
6% 96.8 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3746)
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 36.2
27% 35.9 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 26.4
27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 26.8%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 121 33 6.6 20 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 170
Write 110
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 62.1
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 6.2
968% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 67.2%
 Great: 160%
External USB3.0 240GB
32GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 92 109 106 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 134
Write 99.9
Mixed 117
SusWrite 100
150% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 15.6
1,210% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 21.2
1,819% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 30.9%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel  $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples258x
Core i7 860Intel  $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples156x
Core i7 870Intel  $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples142x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples70x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples45x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples43x
SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples23x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples20x
RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples326x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples230x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples90x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback