Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC Force-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-OC Force
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-OC Force-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 09:49
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 593
56% 464 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 173
Parallax 164
149% 173 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 293 289 295 297 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 457
Mixed 442
SusWrite 297
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 39.7
136% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
273GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1269 1276 1283 1280 1276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,273
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,365
423% 1,886 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 66.6
208% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 784
567% 742 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 272%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 195 192 195 199 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 112
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 193
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 162 170 168 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 162
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 166
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 105%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-OC Force-CF Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC Force-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $605
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback