Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 179
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 351
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
90% 109 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 102
Splatting 100
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 361 419 438 443 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 384
Mixed 371
SusWrite 400
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 35
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 275
231% 335 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 123%
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 380 437 458 447 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 386
Write 406
Mixed 343
SusWrite 365
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 28.2
98% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 308
225% 290 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
182GB free
Firmware: 3.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 96 98 97 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 92
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 94.2
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback