Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200 2,511 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 545 59% 467 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.1 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 61.3 31% 52.4 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 48.2 Splatting 42.6 40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 442 Write 359 Mixed 311 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 36.4 129% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 257 216% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 15.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,211x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	371x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	250x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	54x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	46x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	46x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231