ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP Z4 G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81C5
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230202
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2102 522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 173 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 303 42% 310 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3850) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 79.9 Reflection 77.8 Parallax 83.9 65% 80.5 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 73.7 Splatting 60.3 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 256GB 1,828 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB411D45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 1035 1030 1104 785 889 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,869 Write 1,093 Mixed 970 SusWrite 909 269% 1,210 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 53.6 184% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 717 DQ Write 489 DQ Mixed 614 455% 607 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 274%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 475GB free Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1768 925 600 600 600 587 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,778 Write 1,794 Mixed 1,346 SusWrite 846 323% 1,441 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 58.7 199% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 822 DQ Write 523 DQ Mixed 655 493% 667 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 296%
Samsung 840 EVO 500GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 743GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 399 420 398 396 394 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 411 Write 421 Mixed 365 SusWrite 378 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 41.3 138% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 259 222% 326 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 110%
Samsung 840 EVO 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 466GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 395 396 438 447 416 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 435 Write 203 Mixed 258 SusWrite 392 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 38.5 131% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 245 201% 291 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.6% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 17.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 7.7 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W-2123IntelBench 70%, 2,702 samples	638x
Xeon W-2133IntelBench 77%, 1,612 samples	308x
Xeon W-2125IntelBench 78%, 1,514 samples	299x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	370x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	351x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	332x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	275x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	89x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback