Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics303% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221114
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 10:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$480
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 215
2-Core 429
126% 244 Pts
4-Core 858
8-Core 1,703
151% 1,280 Pts
64-Core 3700
229% 3700 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
303% Outstanding
Lighting 455
Reflection 434
Parallax 517
371% 469 fps
MRender 577
Gravity 380
Splatting 273
319% 410 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 303%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,706
Write 2,009
Mixed 1583
396% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 78.1
251% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,586
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 384
412% 727 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
226GB free
Firmware: 613200WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,217
Write 3,994
Mixed 2,989
762% 3,400 MB/s
4K Read 85.7
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 115
439% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 2,035
DQ Write 1,558
DQ Mixed 1,786
1,338% 1,793 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 494%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 7
Mixed 69.7
67% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.1
151% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X6200C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
203% Outstanding
MC Read 82.9
MC Write 69.2
MC Mixed 72.6
214% 74.9 GB/s
SC Read 52.4
SC Write 73.2
SC Mixed 61.9
179% 62.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 203%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback