Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 08:35
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 307
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 887
81% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 805 775 768 715 656 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,169
Write 2206
Mixed 1,628
SusWrite 774
380% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 94.2
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1037
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 962
722% 965 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 274%
Great: 304%
Nvme Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: STPSC014 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2581 2487 1018 1031 1020 1031 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,635
SusWrite 1,528
390% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 65.5
247% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 1,025
DQ Mixed 1,098
834% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 280%
Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905700-019.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 17
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback