Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 26 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 19:43
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 107
50% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 230
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 76
Parallax 68.6
58% 71.9 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 69.4
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 380 377 293 294 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 426
Write 180
Mixed 333
SusWrite 330
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 33
110% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 202
159% 220 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
341GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 134 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 152
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 139
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 177 174 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 111
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 175
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. GU512303EP0202 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 26GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback