Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 17.9 1-Core 47 2-Core 120 30% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 160 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 224B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4905 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.47% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 5.3 4% 4.6 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.47% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LENSE10256GMSP34MEAT2MA 256GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.3.2902 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 312 301 279 264 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 561 Write 331 Mixed 388 SusWrite 289 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 18.3 58% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 190 152% 216 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 199%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBR2 8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 15 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 337 12% 337 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples	22x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	22x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H2 256GBSamsungBench 204%, 754 samples	5x
LENSE10256GMSP34MEAT2MA 256GBBench 154%, 115 samples	4x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 188 samples	5x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBR2 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 28 samples	4x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 20GBMicronBench 46%, 43 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16