Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220824
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 70.7
1-Core 203
2-Core 407
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1,432
135% 1,121 Pts
64-Core 2,734
169% 2,734 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 187
Parallax 218
158% 200 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 158
Splatting 116
130% 166 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 139%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY Optima 120GB-$77
112GB free
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 148 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 366
Write 146
Mixed 196
SusWrite 147
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 34.3
122% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 135
116% 172 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 82%
PNY SSD2SC120G5SA754D117-510 120GB
51GB free
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 205 204 205 208 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 375
Write 211
Mixed 237
SusWrite 205
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 38
132% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 156
130% 189 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 94%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
156GB free
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 129 558 86 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,166
Write 1,880
Mixed 1434
SusWrite 453
279% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 88.3
302% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1,382
976% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 219%
Great: 299%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1867 1868 1865 1859 1817 1839 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 1,146
Write 1,942
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 1,852
362% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 86.8
287% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1059
DQ Write 1,225
DQ Mixed 1,380
973% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 299%
Great: 299%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
93GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,508
Write 2,513
Mixed 1,879
513% 2,300 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 97.9
305% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,618
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,404
1,057% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 45.2
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 26.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 120%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,031
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback