Acer Predator PO3-640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PO3-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-640
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 22:04
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 196
2-Core 389
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 765
8-Core 1,435
131% 1,100 Pts
64-Core 2053
127% 2053 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Sapphire(174B A632) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 185
Parallax 169
151% 180 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 141
Splatting 124
121% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1520 1649 1678 151 92 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8F KF3200C16D4/8GX ACR32D4U2S8HD-8F KF3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 2400, 3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-640 Builds (Compare 1,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback