Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 189
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 326
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65% Good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 75.5
73% 83.9 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 45.6
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN-25SATAA3-240 240GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 423
Mixed 388
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 21.9
108% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 30.8
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
232GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 161
Write 27.1
Mixed 70.1
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.6
Write 4.7
Mixed 7.7
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback