Supermicro H8DA8-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemSupermicro H8DA8-2  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8DA8-2
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 8439 SE
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 83.5
43% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 333
29% 249 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.3% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 60.8
38% 51.2 fps
MRender 45.7
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 32.5
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 362 362 363 362 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 444
Mixed 416
SusWrite 365
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 44.1
145% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 238
179% 242 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 116%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
521GB free
Firmware: 033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 408 413 415 415 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 432
Mixed 395
SusWrite 411
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 40.1
132% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 210
162% 221 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
331GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 114 113 105 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 105
Write 119
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 110
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
148GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 39 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 64.3
Write 45
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 39.7
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
233GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 67.8
Write 77
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 74.5
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
312GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 86
Write 63.7
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 65.4
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H8DA8-2 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Supermicro H8DA8-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback