Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 347
50% 368 Pts
64-Core 397
24% 397 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.5% Very good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 104
Parallax 91.9
67% 92.7 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 94.5
77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 84 84 83 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 184
Write 119
Mixed 145
SusWrite 80.1
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 27.3
92% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 84.2
70% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback