Lenovo 06061B7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 06061B7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 14:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 173
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 537
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 65.2
54% 67.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 64
54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 70 21 28 34 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 478
Write 378
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 88
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 1
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 69.1
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 19.4
20% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 96%
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
317GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 240 170 221 178 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 215
Write 102
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 215
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 11.4
51% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 103%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
36GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 78 72 63 64 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 85.7
Write 79.1
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 67.5
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 30.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 06061B7 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 06061B7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback