Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130516
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '17 at 17:07
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 580 59% 475 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Palit(1569 1004) 3GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 53.5 Parallax 70 49% 61 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 51.7 50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 501 Write 161 Mixed 259 67% 307 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 19.9 86% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 81.1 100% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba MD04ACA50D 5TB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10377 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 688 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 470 (0A) Spinup retry count 113 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 43 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 841 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188979281953 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 178 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 291 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 60% Great: 108%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0579 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 114 Write 117 Mixed 24.7 101% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.16 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	157x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	44x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16